Thursday, September 4, 2014

An Important Swan Song: A Drash for Parashat Ki Tetzei, Friday 5 September 2014

Everybody has heard the term ‘swan song.’  It comes from the legend, originating as early as with the ancient Greeks, that the mute swan finds its voice just before its death.  Then it sings a beautiful song, and finishes its life in a burst of glory.
          ‘Swan song,’ then has come to mean one’s final performance.  Those in the entertainment industry or the performing arts, when they decide to retire, often pour their heart and soul into their final public performance.  That way, they will feel assured that that performance, their ‘swan song,’ will be memorable…and a fitting end to an illustrious career.
          But the term ‘swan song’ also applies to those in other than the performing arts.  In the US military, when one retires it has become customary to speak at one’s retirement ceremony.  One is expected to give a final good-natured roast to one’s superiors, peers, and just about everybody else.  Of course, the key term here is ‘good natured.’  In the military, as elsewhere, it is considered bad form to use one’s ‘swan song’ to say nasty or biting remarks about others.  A ‘swan song’ is not considered the right occasion for whistle-blowing, although some do use it for that purpose.
          More often, individuals use their ‘swan song’ to present an ethical lesson.  The premise is that many of us in our working careers, like the ancient legend of the swan, are essentially ‘mute.’  We go about our tasks day after day, but others aren’t listening to us.  The organisations for which we toil are only interested in our performance of specific tasks, not in what we think. 
I think that the pandemic of injurious gossip among people is, in part, attributable to this syndrome.  We go through life thinking our legitimate voice is ignored, or quashed.  And yet we have a natural need to find that voice.  So, many people use their voice for that which people listen to.  And that is the use of information, true or untrue, to create interpersonal drama.  I’m not condoning:  only trying to explain, at least in part, this addiction.  But I digress…
We can see the entire book of Deuteronomy as Moses’ swan song to the people Israel.  Moses has been told unequivocally that he will not lead the people across the Jordan River to the Promised Land.  Now you can imagine that this is a bitter pill for him to swallow.  From the time that he confronts Pharaoh, he gives about 40 years of his life to the quest of taking a refugee band and melding them into a nation.  And the reward at the end of the struggle, for the people and for Moses, is the lad that God promised to Abraham:  the Land of Israel.  One would think that Moses, for all his trouble, would rate the joy of seeing this dream to its realization.  But this is not to be.  God has decreed otherwise.
It seems a harsh decree indeed.  And what’s the reason for it?  It is very explicit.  Because, at the Waters of Meribah, Moses struck the rock in anger with his staff rather than speaking to it and commanding it in God’s name to send forth water for the people.  Given the frustration Moses was feeling at the repeated and baseless challenges to his leadership, one can certainly begin to understand why he struck the rock in anger.  We could be forgiven if we sympathise with Moses, even to the point of wondering whether God was not being overly harsh in His judgment here,
 So Moses is most probably feeling more than a bit of bitterness at this point.  Actually, there’s no ‘probably’ about it.  From the text itself, we can ‘hear’ Moses bitterness.  Indeed, even the name of the place where Moses received his judgment – Mei Meribah – means ‘waters of bitterness.’
Moses, therefore, might be forgiven if he’d used his ‘swan song’ to express his bitterness over the decree against him.  Other leaders throughout history, leaders who fell from grace in scandals of various sorts, used their swan songs to attack their detractors and justify their actions.  But not Moshe Rabbeinu, the great law-giver.
Moses is, instead, using his swan song to offer moral instruction to the people Israel.  To offer them his own keen insights as to how to organise themselves, and govern themselves, in their Promised Land.  Specifically, in this week’s portion he speaks of solutions for all sorts of unfortunate circumstances.  Captives of war, slaves who do not desire their freedom, rebellious children, women widowed without a child.  Moses knows that each one of these situations is bound to come up, sooner or later, and he’s instructing the people as to the divine solutions.  He is using his swan song to offer an important benefit to the people.
The truth is that we don’t really know why Moses must die before Joshua leads the people into the Promised Land.  Oh, we can make educated guesses.  I’ve made a few along the way.  Here’s an additional one.  When a commanding general, or a president retires, he does not stick around to continue calling the shots from the background.  When a leader does that, we see it as a pathetic need to maintain control, and almost always with bad consequences.  No, they mostly move on to different roles and challenges, completely outside the structures where they found their power in their careers.
Moses is ready for retirement.  Some of his sharp-edged interactions with the people during the narrative of his last years at the helm, show this rather clearly.  For a variety of reasons, he is not the right man to lead the people in the war of conquest.  But because the entire people will be consumed with the task of the conquest, there is no way for Moses to pass on the mantle of leadership, and still remain on the scene.  In this sense, there is a logic, even if it is a cruel logic, for his death before the conquest begins.
 And yet Moses does not use his swan song to complain and make his case.  Instead, he uses it to provide important legislation – legislation that will serve the people as it works to constitute itself in its Promises Land.  Moses, whose life has been all about giving to others, offers a patently unselfish act in dedicating his swan song to benefit the people.
It’s a wonderful example for us.  Many of us, in various ways, are called upon to end our careers in less-than-desirable circumstances.  How we make our exit, is an important measure of our character.  What we offer on our way out, speaks volumes about the values that guide us.  Whatever our particular path in life, we may very well be offered an opportunity to make our swan song, as statement of the values that guided us during our working careers.  And the principle can be applied to the other ‘careers’ that form part of the rhythms of our lives.  Like many others who have gone before us, we can make our swan songs a spectacle and a circus.  Or in the manner of a few individuals like Moses, we can use the occasion to make a final selfless act.  Shabbat shalom.

No comments:

Post a Comment