Thursday, June 25, 2015

Because I Said So: A Reflection for Parashat Chukat, Friday 26 June 2015

Every child will hear, sooner or later, the following from her parent.  Child:  Why, Mummy?  Mum:  Because I said so.  ‘Because I said so,’ and its variations such as because I’m the parent and other possibilities, is the exasperated parent’s stock answer.  The stock answer to a question whose answer will likely not satisfy the child.  Or perhaps, the question which really has no real answer.  Every child has received this non-answer from a parent at some point.  And every child has experienced the frustration at receiving this non-answer.  But even more, many parents, in giving such a non-answer, find it personally frustrating that they were unable for whatever reason to give a ‘proper’ answer to their child.  So the non-answer ‘because,’ while sometimes unavoidable, is essentially unsatisfactory for all parties concerned.
          If the answer ‘because’ satisfies nobody when delivered by a parent to a child, how much more so when it is offered to an adult as justification for some unwanted outcome.  And yet…not everything in life has a satisfactory explanation.  I think that every adult reading this, knows this in their heart of hearts even though we rebel against the decree when it arrives.
          I’ve always put Hashem’s decree concerning Moses in this category.  That is, the decree delivered in this week’s Torah reading, Chukat.  The decree is that Moses will not live to see the people Israel settle in the Land of Israel, the Promised Land. 
Let’s examine the reasons why Moses should be allowed the honour of leading the people into the land.  Perhaps it’s simply self-evident.  He agreed, even though he believed himself not up to the task, to return to Egypt to confront Pharaoh and convey Hashem’s wishes that the Israelites be let go from their servitude.  He faced a murder charge in doing so.  Then he stood up to Pharaoh repeatedly, at considerable peril to himself, trusting that Hashem would protect him.  Then he led the often-ungrateful people Israel to freedom and in the desert, advocating for them from time to time when Hashem was ready to call it a night and go looking for another people.  Every step of the way, Moses proved himself a patient, long-suffering leader committed to the well-being of his people.  Sometimes, beyond all reason.
And now, Moses is being told that he will die in the desert whilst the people cross over into the Promised Land under the leadership of Joshua bin Nun.  And why?  Drumroll, please…because he struck the rock instead of raising his staff and asking Hashem to bring forth water.  Ya know, for a guy who has been through as much as Moses, or so long, to lose his temper in that way…that seems like a fairly minor offence, not one that should keep him from fulfilling his dream of leading the people into the Land of Israel.  This decree against Mosheh Rabbeinu, seems, G-d forgive me, like an overly harsh decree.
Or is it?  Moses is tired, and his losing his temper shows clearly that he’s tired and getting quite fed up with this people.  He’s 120 years old, after all.  The closing verses of the Torah declare, His eye had not dimmed, and his vigour had not diminished.  (Deuteronomy 34:7)  Nevertheless, his growing testiness at times clearly shows that he needs a rest from his duties.  How can such a towering personality step down and allow someone else to lead the people?
When a general retires from the army, he is well advised to get as far away from the service as possible.  To take a position in business or industry.  Or politics.  But not hang around the military.  If he’s smart, he gets as far away as possible except for ceremonial occasions.  Because when you’ve been the leader it is difficult at best to step down when you haven’t stepped away.  If so with a mere general, how much more so with Moses, the chiefest prophet of all?
In this context, it is possible to look at Hashem’s decree against Moses, like a child’s question for which there is not acceptable answer.  So the parent answers, Because.  Why can’t Moses lead the people into the Promised Land?  Because he hit the rock.  Or, to put it differently, Because.  For Moses, as for any leader in such a situation, there really isn’t a good, reasonable, and acceptable answer.
And yet…how does Moses respond?  At the end of Deuteronomy, as his decree is about to come to fruition, he blesses each one of the tribes.  These tribes, this lot which has so often rebelled against his leadership, it would seem perfectly reasonable to wave off and wash one’s hands of them.  But Moses instead blesses each one of them, before ascending Mt Nebo to catch a glimpse of the land that he will not be allowed to enter.

Would that each one of us have the dignity and grace of Moses.  To accept even an evil decree, and have the class to bless those who perhaps should be paying the price we must.  That’s a sign of the greatness of Moses.  We already know that he is Ish HaElohim, a man of G-d.  We know that he’s brilliant and committed to the well-being of Israel.  And now we know that he is gracious enough to accept his lot even when it seems so unfair as surely it is.  Let’s learn from his example and learn to accept with grace even the unwanted decrees that come our way.  To see the good in them.  To help those who must go on, to do so with our blessing.  Difficult, but look at the example we have!  Shabbat shalom.

Tuesday, June 23, 2015

What's On and Thought for the Week

Dear Friends,

Another week!  Shabbat approaches fast.  Here's your weekly reminder of what we're doing here on the Gold Coast to celebrate this week:

- Friday evening at the Southport Community Centre, Room F5, at 6.30PM.  Service to welcome Shabbat, followed by an Oneg featuring your culinary offerings.  $15 per person requested donation and bring a dish to share.

- Saturday at the Levy home.  11.00AM Service followed by lunch provided.  Then, after lunch a bit of Pirkei Avot.  $15 per person requested donation.

Remember that we now have EFTPOS facility for accepting debit and credit cards when you attend, if you prefer to donate/pay that way.  But the 'old' methods still work:  cash, cheque (to 'Jewish Journeys'), or bank transfer.

In case you choose the last, here are bank details:
Jewish Journeys Ltd
Westpac The Ridge
BSB 034142 Acc't 148110
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you to those who brought in your 'treasures' which are gathering dust, for us to sell at Jewish Journeys' fund-raising garage sale.  But in case you didn't see my e-mail from earlier today, we've decided to postpone it.  We're expecting some bad weather, and we want to hold out for more donated goods and expressed interest.  So, please continue to let us know when you can drop off - or we can pick up - the items you'd like to donate, and we'll announce a new date soon.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
We're now in a series of weekly thoughts in the area of Shemirat Lashon, literally 'Guarding the Tongue' but referring to the vast body of Jewish law concerning forbidden communications via speech or writing of any kind.

I believe with all my heart that this is THE problem in the Jewish community today; its pervasiveness makes a mockery of all our claims of the mantle of Torah.  The essence of the laws is that we are forbidden to convey any adverse information about someone else except in very limited, rare circumstances.

I'm bringing to you the teachings of the Chofetz Chaim, Rabbi Israel Meir Kagan (1839-1933), who published extensively on the subject and indeed is considered the all-time master teacher on what the Torah has to say about it.

Rabbi Kagan teaches:  certain statements that may be perfect acceptable when made about one person, may be lashon hara when made regarding another person. 

For example. you know someone who makes a living running a small business, has a family whom nobody would accuse him of neglecting, and yet he is working on a uni degree in his spare time and finds time to study two hours a day.  No reasonable person would consider this to be adverse information; chances are, if told one would think 'when does he sleep?'  So, if you would mention that he studies two hours a day to a third person, it's fairly certain that that person would take the information as complimentary toward the subject person, as an indication of his commitment to earn his degree despite all the other life commitments that conspire to block his effort.

But what if you knew a younger person, a full-time student being completely supported by his parents, who studies two hours a day?  Chances are, a reasonable person when told of this man's study habits would think, 'Only two hours a day??!  He doesn't sound like a very serious student.'  Applied to this person, the same statement meant (and probably taken) to be complimentary concerning another would probably be reasonably considered adverse.

This is one important reason why we must be ultra-careful when conveying information about another person.  Even when we don't think it is adverse information, it may be taken as such.  And if so, then we are forbidden to repeat it.

I hope that you do not think I'm presenting these laws to beat you over the head, so to speak, with them.  Far from it!  I simply believe that lashon hara is such a pervasive problem, and that we engage in it thoughtlessly, that it helps to think more deeply on the subject and consider all the ways that we can inadvertently or deliberately, engage in adverse speech. 

I hope that everybody is having a great week and look forward to seeing as many of you as possible on Shabbat!

Rabbi Don

Thursday, June 18, 2015

Argument for – What? A Reflection for Parashat Korach, Friday 19 June 2015

Stereotypes are funny, aren’t they?  They don’t come out of a vacuum.  There’s always some element of truth in them.  Or sometimes, distorted truth.  As in the kind that takes an image based on an historical reality, absent the knowledge of the historical context that created that image.  This is the case with a number of prevalent stereotypes concerning us Jews.  And this is why we wear some stereotypes with pride when we discuss them amongst ourselves.  But chafe at them when they are invoked by others.
I’ll give you an example.  There is a stereotype that Jewish women are no pushovers.  To me, that is a point of pride.  To the extent that it’s true – and I think it largely is – it says that there’s something healthy in the Jewish version of the War of the Sexes.  But one time, a non-Jew who was only a superficial acquaintance of mine, e-mailed me a joke.  It went like this:
The Jewish boy came running home from school, excited that he had a part in the school play.  His mother asked him what part he had.  He told his mother excitedly that he was playing the Jewish husband and father.  His mother promptly phoned the boy’s teacher to upbraid her for not giving her son a speaking part.
Now obviously, if there’s a stereotype of strong women, there’s a corollary of men who do not need to be controlling.  Stated this way, that’s a positive stereotype.  But when it becomes distorted into the terms ‘Jewish women are strong at the expense of Jewish men’ then it becomes a negative stereotype.  And it is one thing for Jews to poke fun at one another, another thing entirely for an ‘outsider’ to interject himself into the conversation.  All of this was going through my mind when the man sent me the aforementioned joke.  After thinking about it briefly, I dismissed it.  And decided I would never, ever, share with this man the secret to Jewish wealth accumulation…
          Another stereotype is of Jews as an argumentative lot.  As with the aforementioned, there’s truth to this one also.  Recently a Jewish friend here on the Coast related to me an encounter he’d had with a Christian man.  Whilst the two didn’t agree on much, my friend said:  He was so polite.  He didn’t yell at me…like you do!  Now, I knew that my friend, in saying that, was not so much criticising as issuing a rhetorical challenge.  So I rose to it.  Of course he was polite, I said.  He’s not Jewish!  And we shared a good laugh…
          Yes, the Jewish Way is to not shy away from an argument.  When we think we’ve got a case, we tend to press it.  With vigour.  We Jews are also famous for being ‘in your face,’ for not worrying overly about politeness.  We’re so…so New York!  Or perhaps, New York is just so, so Jewish.
          My distinguished colleague, Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks asserts:  Argument is the lifeblood of Judaism.  He points out that, in Jewish circles, argument is a tool for getting closer to the truth.  Judaism is not a religion of submission, in the way that our two daughter faiths are.  The Jewish Way has always been to learn via spirited conversation.  And one method of that conversation is to advocate a position opposite that or our partner to the conversation.  It’s as if Jewish life is an eternal debating club.  Which makes sense.  Jews made up about a third of the student body of Miami Beach Senior High School when I attended.  But we completely dominated the debating club.  The football team – or Gridiron as the Aussies call it – was ‘goyisch.’
          A large portion of our sacred literature comes to us in the form of a debate, recorded for all time.  Mishnah and Gemarah, the two elements that make up the basic text of the Talmud, document long-running debates on myriad subjects.  And then, on a page of Talmud, are various commentaries that provide insight into various points and counterpoints to construct a sort of ongoing intergenerational debate growing out of the basic text.  When Jews study the Talmud, they study it in pairs or small groups, and the study sessions take the form of…you guessed it, the form of debating sessions.
          But what about the ‘debate’ in this week’s Torah portion, Korach?  Korach argued that Moses and Aaron were, in exercising their leadership roles, placing themselves above the community.  He reminded them, that the entire people was a nation of priests and kings.  So what right did those to have to lead the people?  Korach spoke out so forcefully that he built a following of Datan, Amiran, On, and 250 others who, the Torah tells us, were leaders in their respective tribes and families.  They were not some ‘street rabble.’
          From the Torah, we know that this was not a ‘debate’; it did not fit into the parameters of allowed discourse.  Korach himself, frames his argument against Moses’ leadership clearly.  Egypt had been a land of Milk and Honey.  And Moses had brought the Israelites all this way just so that they should die in the wilderness.  Both statements are so patently false, that there’s simply no fuel for debate in them.  They are bold lies whose only purpose is to stifle debate.
          Korach’s rebellion was about one thing only.  You – Moses – are in power.  I want to be in power.  I’ll say whatever I need to, to grab that power.
          I have recently begun distributing weekly thoughts based on the teachings of the Chafets Chayim, Rabbi Israel Meir Kagan.  He is the Jewish authority on the laws of shemirat lashon, ‘guarding the tongue.’  If you have been reading my weekly offerings, then you know I believe that ‘evilspeak’ is the number one problem besetting the Jewish people today.  Many of the other issues in the Jewish world, stem from our not controlling what we say or write.  And from our not keeping our communications within permitted, and constructive, parameters.  The Chafets Chayim taught these laws with a clarity and erudition that had not been known before or since.  And yet, as far back as the Written Torah we have clarity on the results of evilspeak.
          Many of us have heard of the famous debate between Hillel and Shammai, and between the following generations of each of the two sages’ respective disciples.  The disagreement was deep, but it was לשם שמיים (leshem shamayim) – for the sake of heaven.  This means that the dispute itself, was for the sake of getting further clarity on what Hashem expects of us.  Disputes that are simply for the aggrandizement of one party over another, are not for the sake of heaven.  They are a waste of time and energy.  They consume our attention and our resources and only damage our community.  Everybody knows of disputes not for the sake of heaven, and how they have hurt people.  This week’s Torah reading, concerning the rebellion of Korach, teaches us the dangers of such disputes.  We are well-advised to heed the lesson.  We are deeply blessed when we do.  Shabbat shalom.


What's On and Thought for the Week

Dear Friends,

Another week!  Shabbat approaches fast.  Here's your weekly reminder of what we're doing here on the Gold Coast to celebrate this week:

- Friday evening at the Southport Community Centre, Room F5, at 6.30PM.  Service to welcome Shabbat, followed by an Oneg featuring your culinary offerings.  $15 per person requested donation and bring a dish to share.

- Saturday at the Levy home.  11.00AM Service followed by lunch provided.  Then, after lunch a bit of Pirkei Avot.  $15 per person requested donation.

Remember that we now have EFTPOS facility for accepting debit and credit cards when you attend, if you prefer to donate/pay that way.  But the 'old' methods still work:  cash, cheque (to 'Jewish Journeys'), or bank transfer.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thank you to those who brought in your 'treasures' which are gathering dust, for us to sell at Jewish Journeys' fund-raising garage sale on Sunday, 28 June at Paul's home:  142 Morala Avenue in Runaway Bay.  Does anybody else have any stuff just taking up space?  Of course you do...Clara and I have only been here three years, and even WE do!  So...donate your surplus items to Jewish Journeys, and we'll raise a bit of cash for the treasury.  If you're coming Friday evening or Saturday morning, you can bring small items then.  If you're unable to come on Shabbat but have items, please contact me as to when to drop them off.  If you have items that you'e unable to bring to us yourself, contact me and we'll arrange for us to pick them up.

Help out with your precious, surplus goods, but also plan to come and help - and have a good time doing so! - on the day.  We'll be selling food and drink, and talking to people about Judaism and Jewish Journeys.  Paul tells me that his street sees a lot of traffic on Sundays, so this will raise our profile.  In the coming weeks, we'll circulate signup sheets to enable you to volunteer to cover cooking and greeting during specific times, but for now just mark your calendars for Sunday 28 June and stand by for additional information.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
We're now in a series of weekly thoughts in the area of Shemirat Lashon, literally 'Guarding the Tongue' but referring to the vast body of Jewish law concerning forbidden communications via speech or writing of any kind.

I believe with all my heart that this is THE problem in the Jewish community today; its pervasiveness makes a mockery of all our claims of the mantle of Torah.  The essence of the laws is that we are forbidden to convey any adverse information about someone else except in very limited, rare circumstances.

I'm bringing to you the teachings of the Chofetz Chaim, Rabbi Israel Meir Kagan (1839-1933), who published extensively on the subject and indeed is considered the all-time master teacher on what the Torah has to say about it.

Rabbi Kagan teaches:  it is forbidden to relate that someone has been remiss in matters of Jewish observance - whether a precept of the Written torah, a Rabbinic decree, or even something that is just minhag (custom).  If you think about it, there are two obvious reasons for this.

- First, since lashon hara is forbidden, is it not tantamount to a travesty to violate the Torah's law (ie, Shemirat Lashon) in order to report to someone the breaking of another law (whatever the person in question may have violated)?

- Second, nobody likes people who are 'holier than thou'; everybody I know has at one time or another had a bad taste in their mouth after encountering such a person.  Any 'benefit' that might have resulted from bringing a violation of the Torah to someone's attention, is negated by the use of the Torah to make oneself seem holier than someone else.

Therefore, even though superficially it might make sense to let members of the community know than a member has violated its standards, if one is truly thoughtful one can see that there's no benefit whatsoever to be gained.  Don't do it!

I hope that everybody is having a great week and look forward to seeing as many of you as possible on Shabbat!

Rabbi Don

Thursday, June 11, 2015

A Land that Devours its Inhabitants: A Reflection for Parashat Shelach Lecha, 12 June 2015

the 12 Spies bring back their report
You may know Israeli Jews as a patently fatalistic lot.  It is difficult not to be, living in such a land.  A land that, despite being the closest embodiment of liberal values on the planet, is commonly despised by the world’s Left.  A land that, despite the sometimes-fabulous wealth and political power of its Arab minorities, is frequently seen as a land where its minorities are confined to a series of Soweto-like slums.  A land whose army is probably the most moral in the world, whose soldiers ae held to sometimes-impossible standards in the conduct of combat operations where their enemy exhibits no moral scruples whatsoever, yet much of the world views that army as tantamount to Jack the Ripper and its Hamas enemy as the embodiment of Mother Theresa.  A land seen by much of the world as backward and hopelessly mired in thinking from former centuries yet whose research institutes have come up with an incredible number of the technologies that make our lives ever easier and healthier.
          Given all this, it should not come as a surprise that Israelis develop a jaded view of the world, and a fatalistic view of themselves.  Modern Israeli Hebrew is full of expressions of exasperation and resignation to one’s fate.  But none sums up that spirit more than the phrase, ארץ אוכלת יושביה (eretz ochelet yoshveiha) – a Land that devours its Inhabitants.  Every time an Israeli encounters some senseless behavior among his countrymen, or senseless conflict between them, he is likely to shrug and mutter, eretz ochelet yoshveiha.  It’s as if to say, we can’t help it.  We live in a place that devours its inhabitants.
          The expression, eretz ochelet yoshveiha, is actually found in the Written Torah, in the thirteenth chapter of the Book of Numbers, in this week’s Torah reading, Shelach Lecha.  It is part of the gloomy report brought back to Moses, Aaron, and the entire people Israel by the Twelve Spies whom Moses sent to scout out the Land so that the War of Conquest could be planned.  Actually, by the Ten Spies – since two of their lot, Joshua bin Nun and Caleb ben Yefunneh, reported positively.  The other ten reported that the land they’d been sent to scout out, was a land that devours its inhabitants.  Further, they reported that the land current inhabitants were giants.  They – the Israelite spies – were viewed by them as grasshoppers.
          What could the Spies have meant in declaring that the land devours its inhabitants?  Inhabitants who, in the next breath, they identified as giants?  Were they trying to say that conditions in the land were such that there was an overabundance of conflict and misery among its inhabitants?  The text, as in other places, leaves us hanging.
          But Rashi fills in the lacunae.  He asserts that eretz ochelet yoshveiha is a response to the Spies’ observation that there seemed to be an awful lot of funerals during the Spies’ sojourn.  If so, that was a slim evidence that the land devours its inhabitants.  And Rashi goes on to assert that the profusion of deaths among the Canaanites during the time of the Spies’ visit was even caused directly by Hashem, in order to provide cover for the Spies’ mission.  If so, the Spies were being fatalistic about a phenomenon that was for their very benefit.
          I’ve always found this Torah portion particularly fascinating and, given my own history in military intelligence, I’ve worked hard to understand exactly what was the Spies’ sin.  The sin so grave as to cause Hashem to decree the passing of a generation before the conquest could begin.  In the past, I focused on the negativity of their report and how it ‘infected’ the entire people with a negatively that would make the conquest fail with absolute certainty.  I know from my own experience, that an intelligence analyst’s job is to report the facts and reasonable conclusions concerning the enemy.  But it is not his job to discourage the commander from launching the operation.  His job is to help the commander decided how to succeed.  The reality is that the commander probably has no choice concerning whether to prosecute the battle.  He doesn’t need naysayers.  As we see in this Torah portion, naysayers have a tendency to infect the rest of the troops with their pessimism.  And any military man will tell you that the unquantifiable factor in any operation is the belief among the troops that they will succeed.  It’s unquantifiable, but it is essential.  As soon as the army believes it will fail, it will!  That’s why generals and other leaders are known for their colourful pep-talks to the troops on the eve of the battle.  As George C Scott, playing General Patton, famously delivered in the opening minutes of the movie Patton.  Scott’s soliloquy was taken directly from the text of Patton’s talk to his men as they prepared to deploy from Ft Benning for the launching of the North Africa campaign.
But before, I’d missed Rashi’s explanation, which does clarify matters.  A Land that devours its Inhabitants as a reflection of a large number of funerals whilst the Spies were on the scene.  And the Spies’ completely missed that the deaths were caused specifically to assist them in their mission!
Given this, eretz ochelet yoshveiha is not an understandable expression of fatalism.  Rather, it is completely irrational given the facts.  And the truth is that most fatalism is irrational.  And its result is predictable:  the breaking down of morale.  Unfortunately, we are all in danger, each and every one of us, of falling into fatalism.  No matter what land we dwell in.  And it’s always irrational.  Because fatalism is a self-fulfilling prophecy.  Defeatism brings about defeat.  More than any other factor.  In an army preparing or war.  In a nation preparing for success.  In a family striving for a good future.  Fatalism itself is the most accurate predictor of failure.
I’m almost embarrassed to offer the natural lesson from this, it is so self-evident.  It is incumbent upon us to be optimistic!  We plan and we scheme and we strive.  And if we truly believe that we will succeed, then we will!  Perhaps that success will not look exactly as it did in our plans.  But our belief in ourselves will lead us to a positive end. 
And what about our Israeli cousins?  Truth be told, they’re not really given to fatalism.  The expressions of fatalism that thy predictably make, are really expressions of wonderment.  Of lack of comprehension as to why things are the way they aree.  But the truth is that Israelis as a lot are no more fatalistic them others, and far less so than most.  So many Israelis ae aware of this.  I have been told time and again by Israelis that one must be patently optimistic to live in their land.  
But our Arab cousins are, in contrast, most assuredly fatalistic.  Far more so than many other peoples.  And that is certainly one of the primary reasons why there is so much misery in the Arab world.  But our Arab cousins can’t seem to see that.  Instead they see the relative joy of the Israelis, which so contrasts with their own perceived reality.  And they blame the Israelis for all their problems.  Or the Crusades, which ended more than seven centuries ago.  And this propensity to blame their present day troubles on a tiny nation of eight million, and at the same time on a war 700 years ago (which they won!) is about as irrational as it gets.

So let’s take the lesson.  The result of fatalism is fatality.  And therefore, let’s believe.  Shabbat shalom.  

Thursday, June 4, 2015

Light to Behold: A Reflection for Parashat Beha’alot’cha, 5 June 2015

Oh, the things that we take for granted!  When I’m home and I need light, I reach for one of the wall switches and throw it.  Even in the dark, I hardly have to grope about for that switch.  I know where they’re all located, in every room.  And that’s important, because I’m sometimes a bit insomniac.  That’s a little ‘gift’ from my various life experiences, something that comes and goes but usually comes.  So I awake in a house that’s completely dark.  I need to find my robe, find my way out of the bedroom, close the bedroom door as gently as possible lest I disturb Clara, and find the light switch outside the bedroom.
          The funny thing is, even when I’m away from home I can usually instinctively find the wall switch.  It seems that they’re often placed in a logical location, and at a height where the average-height person is likely to reach for it.  So for one who gets up at night a lot, life is not terribly dangerous in that regard.
          Until I go camping.  Every camper worth his salt brings his torch – or flashlight as we Americans call it – and makes sure it has fresh batteries.  And then he places it close to his sleeping bag, so that a nocturnal need to get up will not result in excessive groping in the dark for it.  And that’s important.  Because a stroll in the dark at home might result in bumping into furniture or some such.  But a similar stroll at a campsite might result in falling into a hole in the ground.  The camper may sleep with his shoes on to save him from that bit of groping in the dark, but torches have a way of rolling under other gear in the tent.  Trust me, I have first-hand experience with this!
          A camper does not take light to see by as a given.  He knows that he must arrive at his campsite prepared with various types of torches and lanterns by which to perform the chores of camp life.  Campers tend to build and maintain large, roaring campfires whose only real purpose is to increase one’s carbon footprint.  But they still need lanterns if they want to read.  Or do kitchen chores at night or early in the morning.  Believe me, if you have kitchen duty in the morning in camp, you don’t wait until full sunrise to get breakfast started!
Almost everybody on the planet’s got a torch, because after all electricity occasionally does fail.  The problem for most of us is that, if we actually need the thing because the lights have gone out, we probably wouldn’t remember where we stowed it!  And when we bought it, we probably didn’t think too deeply about it.  We probably spent as little as possible on it, as possible.
          Campers, in contrast, engage in deep contemplation over which torch to buy.  It’s a most important piece of gear.  Go to your local Katmandu or BCF store, and you’ll find many choices of torches.  And campers drooling over them.  After a sleeping bag and tent, the torch is probably the most important symbol of camping life.
          Ask almost anybody what is the most important symbol of Judaism, and they will probably tell you it is the six-pointed star, the ‘Star of David’ or more properly the Magen David, the Shield of David.  The simple, geometric motif is found emblazoned on Jewish buildings and their furnishings, the covers of many Jewish books, and on all manner of Jewish tchotchkes.  In people’s minds, the Magen David is the Jewish equivalent of the Christian Cross.  Just as the Crescent is the Islamic equivalent.  But the Magen David hasn’t always been so strongly associated with Judaism and Jews.  It only appears as an important symbol of Judaism in about the 17th century.  It was present in antiquity, but not particularly as a symbol of Judaism.
          In antiquity, the most important symbol of Judaism was the Menorah, the seven-branched candelabra which was one of the important furnishings in the Temple.  Today, one seldom sees a seven-branched Menorah on display in a Jewish place.  You’re more likely to see the Chanukah Menorah, more properly the Chanukkiah, its nine-branched cousin.  I more often see small, seven-branch Menorahs in Christian homes.  I’m not sure why that is so, but it is.
          I’ve got nothing against the Magen David as a symbol of Judaism.  Franz Rosenzweig wrote a wonderful book, Der stern der Erlösung. The Star of Redemption.  In it, he famously wrote that he saw in the intertwined triangles of the Magen David, the symbol of humanity reaching towards G-d whilst G-d simultaneously reaches toward humanity.  It’s a compelling vision, and a compelling case for the Magen David as the primary symbol of Judaism.
          But let’s not be so quick to toss away the Menorah as a symbol of Judaism.  And there is no shortage of symbolism in the Menorah.  First and foremost, it is a reminder of the Holy Temple, which itself was a reminder of G-d’s Presence among us.  And it was a vessel that bore light, reminding us of how G-d’s Light illumines our lives if we let it.  And its seven branches can be taken as symbolic of the Seven Branches of knowledge.  The ability of Understand a draw conclusions.  The knowledge of nature.  The knowledge of the soul.  The knowledge of biology.  Music.  Metaphysics.  And finally, the knowledge of Torah.  It was to be made by beating it out of the purest gold.  This is a reminder of G-d’s Purity.
          This week’s Torah reading, Beha’a lot’cha instructs the Kohen Gadol, the High Priest, to light the Menorah each day.  The message is clear.  The Kohanim, serving in their unique role in the sacrificial ritual, made G-d’s Light shine so it was visible to all the Jews and, by extension, the entire world.  Today, whilst some Jews claim priestly lineage, there is no priesthood to serve that purpose.  All Jews serve that purpose as a “nation of priests, a holy people.”  Would that we were worthy of that responsibility.  

G-d’s Light is not automatically discernable.  It must be tended and nurtured.  Powerful symbols make it real.  Those symbols become Holy by extension, because we have a need to see and touch holiness.  Let this Shabbat be for us a symbol of G-d’s Holiness.  As we revel in its sounds and tastes, let us feel as if we’ve been touched by G-d Himself.  Let us neither grope in the dark for Him, as a camper might grope for his torch at night.  Let us not take Him for granted, as we might take the availability of electric light for granted.  However we wish to visually symbolise that, is just fine with me.  Shabbat shalom.

Wednesday, June 3, 2015

Weekly Post and Thought

Dear Friends,

Another week is drawing quickly to its conclusion; where do the days go?  I have to tell you; last Shabbat was wonderful for me.  The energy and joy at our services was palpable.  I hope you felt even a fraction of what I did!  I hope you'll come and be a part of this week's helping.

- Friday evening at the Southport Community Centre, Room F5, at 6.30PM.  Service to welcome Shabbat, followed by an Oneg featuring your culinary offerings.  $15 per person requested donation and bring a dish to share.

- Saturday at the Levy home.  11.00AM Service followed by lunch provided by Clara.  Then, after lunch a bit of Pirkei Avot.  $15 per person requested donation.

Remember that we now have EFTPOS facility for accepting debit and credit cards when you attend, if you prefer to donate/pay that way.  But the 'old' methods still work:  cash, cheque (to 'Jewish Journeys'), or bank transfer.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
We're going to hold a fund-raising garage sale on Sunday, 28 June at Paul's home:  142 Morala Avenue in Runaway Bay.  Got any stuff just taking up space?  Of course you do...Clara and I have only been here three years, and even WE do!  So...donate your surplus items to Jewish Journeys to sell at our Garage sale and raise a bit of cash for the treasury.  Bring small items when you attend Friday evenings or Saturday mornings until then.  For large items, talk to Paul or me about dropping them off; if you haven't the capability to transport them, we'll pick them up from your place.

Help out with your precious, surplus goods, but also plan to come and help - and have a good time doing so! - on the day.  We'll be selling food and drink, and talking to people about Judaism and Jewish Journeys.  Paul tells me that his street sees a lot of traffic on Sundays, so this will raise our profile.  In the coming weeks, we'll circulate signup sheets to enable you to volunteer to cover cooking and greeting during specific times, but for now just mark your calendars for Sunday 28 June and stand by for additional information.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
As I said last week, the next series of weekly thoughts will be in the area of Shemirat Lashon, literally 'Guarding the Tongue' but referring to the vast body of Jewish law concerning forbidden communications via speech or writing of any kind.

I believe with all my heart that this is THE problem in the Jewish community today, and its pervasiveness makes a mockery of all our efforts to practice Jewish religion.  The essence of the laws is that we are forbidden to convey any adverse information about someone else except in very limited circumstances.  And those allowable circumstances are so limited that they only occur in very rare circumstances.

I promised last week, that this week I would dive into the teachings of the Chofetz Chaim, Rabbi Israel Meir Kagan (1839-1933), who published extensively on the subject and indeed is considered the all-time master teacher on what the Torah has to say about it.

But if you'll indulge me, before we delve into the Chofetz Chaim, I'm going to offer some background from theWritten Torah.

If you'll look at the Torah, in the book Vayikra (Leviticus),Parashat Kedoshim, chapter 19 verse 16, you'll find the following Negative Commandment:  לא תלך רכיל בעמיך -Don't go about as a tale-bearer among your people.  The word 'rachil,' tale-bearer is the equivalent of 'gossip.'  It means to spread any information that is not positive, about someone else.  Does this mean that you can't tell others, when some mutual friend of acquaintance is (for example) unwell?  No.  As long as you're sure that the person in question does not desire to keep that information private, for whatever reason, there is no prohibition on the spreading of such information when it is clearly for the purpose of letting people know of the distress of someone else for the purpose of getting them to provide support.

Likewise, if the information is clearly positive and is presented in that spirit, then there's no prohibition on relaying such information.  As an example, you've heard that so-and-so's son is getting married.

But where there's any doubt about the information being taken as positive, then to go about repeating it is tantamount to being a rachil, a tale-bearer.

But keep reading in the verse:  ולא תעמוד על דם רעיך - so you don't stand upon you neighbour's blood.  The Torah is clear; to be a rachil is tantamount to being a murderer.  That's strong language, but if you think about it, it is not an exaggeration.  The damage that tale-bearing can and willdo to someone's character, their reputation, their ability to earn a living...is immeasurable.

The final clause of the verse is ויראת מאלוקיך אני השם - so you shall revere your G-d, I am Hashem.  The message is clear; if we revere G-d - and we are commanded to do so - then we must comply with this difficult principle.  The Torah invokes this clause wherever a commandment that is expected to be difficult to obey, is presented.

I hope that everybody is having a great week and look forward to seeing as many of you as possible on Shabbat!