Charlton Heston as Moses, faces off with Yul Brenner as Pharaoh Ramses in the 1956 film, ;The Ten Commendments' |
Being married to an Israeli, I’ve gotten used to every shopping
expedition taking on the air of a trip to the shuk, to the bazaar. Clara insists on negotiating price every time
we make a purchase. Unless it’s laundry
soap, or something equally pedestrian.
But in most stores, for most purchases, she will never just pay the
stated or marked price without trying to negotiate a better one.
Of course, she
learned this behavior in the informal shuk in Israel. Today, there are modern supermarkets all over
the country. Just like here in
Australia, one can even shop online and have the one’s groceries delivered home. Inside the supermarkets, there are working
bakeries, salad bars, and hot food to go.
But alongside the supermarkets, the institution of the shuk endures,
beloved by many veteran Israelis. Many
visitors to Israel make a stop at one of the two largest of these markets: Shuk Carmel in Tel Aviv, or Mahane
Yehuda in Jerusalem. When I lived in
Jerusalem for a year to study, I did my weekly shopping at Mahane
Yehuda. It was the place for
the freshest fruit and veg and the best prices.
And it made shopping an experience, not just a quick trip to fill
the trolley.
At the shuk, one
learns to negotiate price. Here in the
West, we are used to negotiating only for houses and cars. But in the Middle East, one negotiates for everything. It is said that, if you wander into a shop
there and don’t negotiate, the shopkeeper will be insulted. I cannot confirm this. But I do know that, once you start
negotiating, the shopkeeper rises up to the Challenge of the Game. And the Game is fun for all. I experienced this especially in Turkey. Once, whilst I negotiated for a carpet, I noted
that every other patron in the shop stopped what they were doing and watched
the negotiations. Perhaps it was
particularly interesting because I was a foreigner with limited Turkish. But they stopped their own shopping to see
what kind of price I could negotiate.
And once the sale was agreed, the shopkeeper ordered tea and sweets
brought in for everybody in the store.
Everybody had enjoyed watching the yabanci bargain like a Turk.
In this week’s Torah
reading, we see the desperate dialogue between Moses and Pharaoh devolve, for a
time, into a playful Middle Eastern bargaining session. In the past, you’ve heard me urge you to
learn Hebrew because much of the humour, poetry, and deeper meanings of the
Hebrew get lost in translation. But in
this week’s portion, this playfulness actually comes through even in the
English. For a change, everybody gets to
enjoy it.
Moses has been
commanding Pharaoh all along, to let the Israelite people go so that they
may worship Hashem. Of course, he
means that they must be freed, period, so that they may worship Hashem by
travelling to their Promised Land and organising there their society in
accordance with Hashem’s laws. When
Pharaoh repeatedly refuses, Moses makes it clear that the resulting plague is
imposed by this G-d, Hashem, and not through any powers possessed by
Moses himself. When Moses and Aaron
threaten Egypt with the next plague, Locusts, Pharaoh’s advisors for the first
time show themselves to be more than sycophantic Yes Men. They urge him to let the Israelites go and
worship their G-d, as Egypt has already been severely damaged and stands to be
completely ruined.
But Pharaoh doesn’t
really ‘get’ it. He interprets the ‘worship’
that Moses tells him the Israelites need to carry out, as being a discreet
event for which they must sojourn to some place in the wilderness, then
return. Of course he is thinking in
terms of the cults of the gods of Egypt, who demand sacrifices and then, once
they’re thus placated, the people just go on with their lives as before. The gods of Egypt do not make continuing moral
demands upon the people.
So Pharaoh begins
negotiating with Moses on the basis that this ‘letting my people go’ is a
temporary event. Maybe he does understand
what Moses is really demanding.
But as he warms to the negotiation, he treats it as if it were just a
limited evolution. As if letting my
people go to worship Hashem meant that the Israelites would accomplish said
worship, then return to resume their labours.
The playfulness with
which Moses parries the Pharaoh’s positions, makes it clear that he is willing
to play the Game. Pharaoh tells Moses to
take his people and go worship. And who,
he asks, needs to go? Moses tells him
that everybody must go: men,
women, and children. Pharaoh tells him ‘nothing
doing’; he should take the men, do what they need to do, and get back
immediately. Pharaoh’s frame of
reference is clearly Egypt’s cults, where only men participate in the offering
of sacrifices. But Moses insists that
their G-d, Hashem, is different.
He demands that all worship together: men, women, and children. But Pharaoh won’t agree to this.
So the locusts come. And then the darkness. And Pharaoh calls Moses back. He agrees that all the Israelites may
go. Pharaoh then tells Moses to take all
the people to offer their sacrifice; just leave their livestock behind. It’s clear that, even if he ‘gets’ it that
Moses means freeing the Israelites for once and forever, he’s still conceding
only a temporary freedom for a specific event. But Moses responds playfully: If we go to sacrifice without our
livestock, what can we sacrifice? He explains that the protocols of the
sacrifice involve pulling out the choicest animals from the herd and flock, so
therefore it is necessary for them to travel to where they’ll erect their altar
with their complete herds and flocks. But
Pharaoh doesn’t want to allow this; he wants some surety that the
Israelites will return. And sending them
out without their flocks, would suffice.
But of course, from Moses’ perspective it would not. So he refuses Pharaoh’s ‘last, best offer’ and
that sets the stage for the final plague, the Slaying of the Firstborn.
The lesson? There are so many lessons to draw from this
Torah. But perhaps one important lesson
is that we need not take ourselves so seriously that we cannot enjoy a little
humour even in the most desperate situation. Even in the darkest of life-and-death situations,
we can draw a little humour to make the situation just a little more bearable. I can give you an example of this.
In 1968 the USS
Pueblo, an America Navy spy ship was taken forcibly by North Korea and its crew
detained. In one of the photos taken by
the North Koreans of crew members, they are seen extending their middle
fingers, ‘flipping the bird’ to their captors.
When the Koreans saw the photo, they demanded to know the nature of this
gesture. The crewmen answered: “It’s the
Hawaiian Good Luck sign.” And afterward
they frequently flipped their captors the bird in the course of their daily
interactions, telling them “Good luck!” each time. Their captors of the ‘Hermit Kingdom’ were so
ignorant of other cultures that they were fooled for a time. Eventually they found out that the extended
finger was a gesture of contempt, and they beat the prisoners. But for a time, their displaying the middle
finger to their captors with impunity, raised their morale and made their
captivity more bearable.
Even when things
seem hopeless, we can approach our situations with a little humour. Most of us never face the kind of conditions
faced by the crew of the Pueblo. Or of
Moses, when he faced down Pharaoh. So if
they could respond with a little playfulness even in extremis,
then we can lighten up from time to time. And this is not a lesson lost on the Jewish
people. Our brand of humour is celebrated,
and is enjoyed by Jew and gentile alike.
But sometimes, Members of the
Tribe inconveniently forget this. And
when we do, we add unnecessarily to the grimness of our lives. So I say:
Lighten up! Even when
logic might preclude it. Shabbat shalom.
No comments:
Post a Comment