President Obama holds an annual conference call with Reform Rabbis,
shortly before Rosh Hashanah. He expects
that Reform Rabbis will preach about some grand public policy issue on this
important day. And he expects that
Reform Rabbis will be particularly sympathetic to his agenda. And will support it if he can communicate it
clearly to them. And he is, in large
part, correct.
In the first year of
Obama’s presidency, he asked Reform Rabbis to talk up the Affordable Care Act,
which is popularly called, ‘Obamacare.’ As
you are probably aware, Obamacare ultimately became the Law of the Land. Six years on, he considers it to be his
signature domestic policy success.
I opened my sermon
that Rosh Hashanah by telling my congregation about that conference call and
the President’s request that I talk to them about health care. As I did, I saw some rolling of eyes. I told them that, as much as I respect the
President of the United States and Leader of the Free World, I was going to talk
about something more important to me. In
truth, had I spoken about the ACA I would have spoken against it. But in truth, I simply had another agenda.
This year, the President asked Reform Rabbis to talk about
the Joint Comprehensive Plan of
Action Regarding the Islamic Republic of Iran's Nuclear Program, or “JCPOA’ but
more commonly called ‘The Iran Deal.’ Of
course, he wants us to talk it up. If it
passes Congress as is expected, Obama will consider it his signature foreign
policy achievement. Again, I think the
topic is certainly important. If I were
going to speak on it, I would not be at all supportive of it. But again my agenda is not exactly in line
with that of Chief Rabbi Obama…
Everybody likes consistency in
relationships. Even if you’re adventurous,
you like knowing where you stand with others. Particularly in business dealings, or in
transactions where the other person represents some structure or institution. In such encounters, it is only natural to wish
to know the parameters and to expect them not to shift over time.
This preference
extends to personal relationships as well, but we tend to accept that these are
going to be more fraught with unexpected twists and turns. It goes with the territory when emotional
baggage comes into play.
As you know, I spent
28 years of my adult life in military service.
When I first enlisted, nobody could understand why I would volunteer for
such a gig. It was, after all, not long
after Vietnam. And people didn’t see me
as being a particularly disciplined individual.
It was a challenge for me to build a mindset of discipline. Along the way, I learned something important
about myself. I learned that I prefer to
know where I stand. With other
people. With ‘The System.’ In any situation, it was comforting to know
that I only had to read the relevant regulation. I would know exactly what was expected of me,
and what I could expect from others. If
people’s expectations or performance were not within the parameters laid down
in the regulation, I could easily invoke the reg.
Like many career
military men, I’ve found my adjustment back to civilian life challenging in
several ways. I joke that I’ve had
trouble learning to sleep in in the morning.
Who needs a rabbi at oh-dark-thirty?
But sometimes, people have wanted me to attend meetings that last late
into the evening. So logically, I would
have learned early on to sleep in and stay up later. That has been a challenge. I am just now, seven years on, learning to
sleep after the sun rises. Sometimes.
It’s hard to argue that consistency,
is an important element of military life.
Not so civilian life. Unlike in
the military, a lot of the ‘rules’ governing expectations are unwritten. There’s no published regulation, carefully
written to make it clear to all concerned, what is expected of them. Instead there’s a fuzziness, with expectations
that are often difficult to pin down.
They can – and do – shift over time and with events. The expectations, rather than being based on
a fixed standard, are more often based on how people feel at any given
moment. And of course the tyranny in
that is that people feel differently at different times. Not to mention that different people feel differently,
period.
I’ve tried to conduct my rabbinate
more in a ‘military’ style. Not so much
that I expect military-style consistency from people. Clara disabused me of that idea years
ago. When I would get frustrated with
our children, she would often remind me:
They’re not your soldiers.
Rather, that I’ve tried to be ‘military’
in conveying consistency myself. This,
so that people will know where they stand with me. They shouldn’t have to guess. My success in this area has not been 100
percent. Even if we strive for
perfection, we never achieve it absolutely.
So someone could accuse me of not being consistent all the time. And they would probably not be wrong.
About a year ago, someone gently
suggested to me that I was not entirely clear in telling potential converts how
long the process would take. I would tell
people that it takes ‘about a year.’
What I meant is that it takes a year, if the individual candidate
meets the milestones in a timely fashion.
And completion of the process – the convening of a Beit Din – will take
place not necessarily exactly a year after the start date of the
process. To convene a Beit Din is a not
easy. So I would tell the candidate; if
they fulfilled the requirements within a year, they could expect that the Beit
Din would happen a reasonable amount of time afterward, ‘rewarding’ their work
with a sense of closure and arrival.
So within the past year someone
close to me challenged me that that was a bit fuzzy. This, given a widespread problem in the
Jewish community today, of candidates for conversion being ‘strung along’ for
years, with the goal of having their ‘membership’ always in the distant
future. I knew that wasn’t how I
operate. But I reflected on how I
communicate the expectations, and how long they candidates should expect it to
take. I’ve adjusted the way I
communicate it. And I told the person
who had brought it to my attention, thanking him for doing so.
Since I’ve brought up conversion, I
would like to address another aspect of the process. But I don’t mean only conversion in
its most limited sense: becoming a
Jew. I mean conversion in a broader
sense, in that Judaism is supposed to lead to a conversion of the people
who cling to it. Maybe conversion is
not quite the right term; perhaps transformation is a better term to use
in this context. But back to the premise
of conversion to Judaism…
When people make their first enquiry
about conversion they almost always approach the process as It’s All
About Me. This is absolutely natural
and expected. The journey into Judaism
is motivated by personal needs. And it
is intensely personal. But I try to
convey from the outset that, if the process is going to actually lead to
conversion, it has to ultimately become All About something else. And that Something Else, is Community.
Community itself is a fuzzy word; it
can mean different things to different people.
I hope I’ve been successful in communicating what it means for me. Someone might personally define community
differently from how I do. But my
definition will, for better or worse, be the yardstick by which I measure
whether It’s All About Community has become a reality for this
candidate…or not.
Some of you have surely heard of the
religion called, Wicca. Many people
dismiss Wicca as being satanic worship.
Actually what it’s closer to, is an attempt by Western peoples to return
to a pre-Christian worship of earth and nature.
For some disaffected Christians, it has turned into an ‘I Hate
Christianity’ club. Disaffected Jews
seldom become Wiccans. They become
Buddhists. But that’s another sermon,
for another day…
There are two kinds of Wiccans. Those who join with a group. And Solitaries, who practice Wicca on their
own and on their own terms. As I understand
it, it doesn’t matter which path one chooses.
If a person considers himself to be a Wiccan, nobody is going to
question that assertion.
Judaism is somewhat different. Those interested in becoming Jews, are
usually looking for some kind of community imprimatur. And I, as a Rabbi, am one of the ones who
grants that imprimatur…or doesn’t.
Sometimes, someone comes to me and tells me that they want to become a
Jew, without being involved in a community – mine or some other one. One would think this counter-intuitive. If they wanted to ‘become a Jew’ without
being involved in a community – to be a Jewish Solitary, as it were – then why
would they need the piece of paper – the conversion certificate – that I can
give them? The answer is: usually, they want something specific from
the community. For example, assurance of
Jewish burial down the road. Sometimes,
the possibility of living in Israel. These
are the two most frequent reasons cited, but there are others. And they want this on their own terms,
without needing to get involved in a community and all that implies. In other words, they want it to be All
About Me, without any need for a phase shift.
I’ll tell you why It’s All About
Me is problematic, and why it has no place ultimately in religious life. And why it has to become It’s All About
Community.
It runs like the rain through our
contemporary society. We usually don’t see
the attitude in ourselves, because we hide it behind little commitments and
sacrifices we make along the way. But
it’s there nevertheless, looming large behind whatever edifice we’ve
constructed to deny its presence.
I’ll prove it. Probably the most fundamental structure we’ll
point to, to disprove that It’s All About Me, is the family. But the family is in deep trouble today. People see their marriages as
disposable. Many don’t even bother
getting married before setting up household and making children, because they
think it will be easier to walk away when the time comes that they want
to. I see very little commitment by
grown children, to their parents’ welfare.
And I see so many relationships between grown siblings, where there is any
relationship at all, as being dysfunctional. Today, the family is very much in trouble. It’s not because we don’t care. It’s because It’s All About Me.
So what I’m asserting is that, for
most of us, It’s All About Me is our operating principle. But we’re all about denying it, because it
doesn’t fit our self-image of being people who care about others. And I’m not trying to say that we don’t
care. But still…It’s All About Me.
Where this becomes really
problematic is in Jewish religious life.
If it’s All About Me, then it can’t be All About Torah. There simply is no room for both. But what exactly would this mean, to say that
It’s All About Torah? Am I
talking about a picture of an inflexible, absolute reality, an orthodoxy if you
will? In a word, no. It’s All About Torah, means that the
Torah is not just a fancy scroll that we carry around in circuits and reach out
to kiss it with the corner of our Tallit.
This, before it is read with great ceremony, in a fancy Hebrew and
chanted according to a fixed melody.
Rather, it means that Torah is the accepted narrative of Jewish
life. That we endeavour to live our lives
according to the values and dicta that it conveys. This, as a community of Jews. Not in isolation. Because one thing the Torah conveys most
clearly, is that it’s all about the People Israel. Not about the individual Jew. This is different from a number of our
neighbours’ religions, which are clearly more about a personal relationship with
G-d.
I cannot force you to be a
functioning member of the community. Nor
would I want to have the role of enforcer. I don’t believe in Judaism by coercion. So if you’re here casually, and I will not
see you until the next major festival, that’s regrettable. I think you’re missing something
important. But the reality is that the
thing I’m ‘selling’ so to speak – community – cannot be conveyed in a casual
visit. If you expect that from your
visit today, forgive me if it disappoints you…but it was bound to be so.
But if you want something from me,
which is predicated on your being functionally a part of the community, then I
need to see that it’s so. It may not be
the case tomorrow. I cannot foresee
tomorrow. And if I make this demand of
you, and you object because you see others who are not fulfilling it,
know that I cannot enforce my will unless someone wants something specific from
me.
Sometimes, our commitment to a
particular principle will require us to stand apart from a particular
structure. In the case of Jewish
community, there is much within its structures that has nothing to do with
Torah. Here within Jewish Journeys, we
are outside any of the larger structures of the Jewish community. But we ae nonetheless not outside of Community
in the greater sense. We work hard,
and I hope we achieve consistency, in conveying the value of connection to K’lal
Yisrael – to the greater community of Israel.
So there you have it: my agenda for this morning, for the minutes before
we hear the sound of the shofar. The
Great Tekiyah will not punctuate my thoughts on the Iran Deal. My apologies to my Commander in Chief. Instead, when Paul thrills us all with his
performance as Ba’al Tekiyah he will be punctuating my essential
question to you this morning. And that question
is: Are you still in the It’s All
About Me place? If so, are
you willing to consider transcending it?
To move to that It’s All About Torah place? It’s not something one does in a moment, in a
snap of the fingers. It’s a journey to
move from one paradigm to the other. The
journey may be long and meandering. But
it is ultimately worthwhile. I can
attest to that, because I have travelled that road myself. Nay, I am travelling it as we
speak. Join me on this very Jewish Journey. Shana Tova.
No comments:
Post a Comment