...someone just passed me these pictures from our congregation's Chanukah celebration. As has been my custom for years, I invited everybody to bring their own chanukkiot to the Friday evening service during the festival, and we all lit our lights before the start of the Shabbat service. As you can see, the collection of lights really illuminates the shul! And no, we didn't burn it down...or set anybody's hair on fire! (This is the only time during the year when I allow photography in the sanctuary on Friday...since we did not yet begin the Shabbat service.) After evening worship, we gathered in the Jacobs Social Hall for a festive Oneg Shabbat, and Harry Nussbaum as 'Chanukah Harry' even made an appearance, bringing gifts for all the kids!
If you're in or near the Gold Coast and don't come visit us, you're really missing out! And by the way...Happy Sylvester!
Monday, December 31, 2012
Thursday, December 27, 2012
Drashot for Vayechi
Jewish Connection Through Chinese Food
A Drash for Friday, 28 December 2012
There’s a stereotype that Jews love to eat Chinese
food. By extension, we tend to like all
kinds of Asian food. Here in Australia,
this doesn’t make us stand out; it seems like everybody in the Land of Oz likes
Asian food, and many Ozzies have travelled extensively in the countries from
which these cuisines originate. But
those of us who have been around a while, know Chinese food as the ‘original’
Asian cuisine, popular around the world before Japanese, Korean, Malay, Vietnamese
and Thai caught on. There was a time
when ‘Asian Fusion,’ had we used the phrase then, would have meant, a
restaurant serving both Human and Cantonese.
US Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan at her confirmation hearing. Asked if she remembered what she'd been doing last Christmas, she quipped: "Well, almost certainly eating Chinese Food, Senator." |
There’s
a saying, said only half in jest among Jews, that ‘treif’ foods – by this I
mean pork and shellfish – are only permitted in Chinese food. But of course that makes no sense; if treif
is treif, it’s treif all the time. So
why the saying? Perhaps it alludes to
the fact that everything in Chinese cuisine is chopped up small and covered
with sauces and other ingredients, and is therefore unrecognisable for what it originally
was. If it doesn’t look or taste like
pork, how can you be held accountable for eating it, right? Anyway, that’s how the logic works. And the bad news? Well, my friends…it’s still treif.
So
Jews like to eat Chinese any day of the year.
But among American Jews particularly, there’s a ‘tradition’ of eating it
particularly on Christmas. As I
understand it, this particular tradition doesn’t especially translate into ‘Strine,’
so perhaps I should explain it as best I can.
The
USA is a much more religious country than Australia. Here, for most Aussies, Christmas has nothing
to do with Christianity. It is an
entirely secular holiday, an excuse for exchanging gifts, getting together with
family and friends, eating too much, and going to the beach. After all, Dude, it’s summer! But in America, for most Americans, there is
at least some religious element to their Christmas celebration. Because of this, American Jews don’t feel
quite as free as Aussie Jews, to participate in the Christmas celebrations
going on around them. But like here, it’s
a national holiday; few people work on Christmas. So American Jews find themselves with a free
day, and they feel inhibited from participating in the spirit of the day. So they had to develop their own traditions
for the day. As we remember, Jews
particularly like Chinese food. And few
Chinese are Christians, so proprietors of Chinese restaurants tend to open
their businesses on Christmas. A bunch
of Jews who like Chinese at large, a bunch of Chinese restaurants open: Voila!
A new tradition is born!
Several
months ago, not long after my arrival here on the Gold Coast, we received an
e-mail through the temple website. It
was from a Jewish woman in Boulder Colorado, who wrote that she would be in the
area on Christmas Day while travelling extensively in this part of the
world. Do the Jews here eat Chinese on
Christmas? If so, could she join up with
any of us to share such a meal on Christmas?
I responded that I had no idea as to whether eating Chinese on Christmas
was something the Jews here do, but my family would be happy to meet her and go
out for Chinese on Christmas. And so, on
Tuesday afternoon, we met up with the woman from Boulder, Colorado and ate
Chinese food.
Why
do I mention this tonight for my Shabbat evening drash? Apart from, that it’s a cute story to tell?
I
mention it, because of how delightfully telling it is of the way that Jews seem
to automatically connect with one another, no matter where they find
themselves. Our common Jewishness, and
our common taste for Chinese food, served as an immediate connection with this
woman from Colorado who had the cheek to write and see if she could meet up
with us. And the connection will not
disappear now that Christmas is over. Some
local friends went along with us, and it happens they are beginning to plan an
extended tour of the USA. So they took
the Boulder woman’s contact information, and I wouldn’t be surprised if they
work in a stop in that delightful Colorado town when they’re in the area.
In
the second century CE, after the disastrous Bar Kochba Rebellion against Rome,
the Jews of the Land of Israel were dispersed to the very ends of the Roman Empire. Because of the randomness of that dispersion,
most Jews suddenly had family connections with Jews in any number of
places. When the Empire went from Pagan
to Christian, the Church fathers decreed that Christians could not lend money
at interest. The burgeoning mercantile
economy made possible by the Empire would have ground to a halt had it not been
for Jewish moneylenders and bankers who financed trade and facilitated the
exchange of large sums between far-flung cities.
Most
Jews do not work in moneylending of the international transfer of funds
today. But the idea of being
automatically connected to Jews, no matter where, remains ingrained in our
consciousness. Most of us have
experienced an automatic connection with other Jews, at one time or another,
when travelling. The good news is, that
despite all the philosophical disputes that divide one Jew from another, this
feeling of connectedness seems to transcend all that. Sure, some Jews are more observant and others
less. But we all seem to like Chinese
food. And treif is still treif. Shabbat shalom.
Happy Sylvester!
A Drash for Saturday, 29 December 2012
A few years back, before I retired from the
military, we were living in Germany.
Because we lived on one air base and my office was on another a few kilometres
away, I quickly found a radio station I liked for listening to music whilst
driving back and forth. When I drive
relatively short distances, I tend to keep the radio on but not pay much
attention to it; instead I’m usually deep in thought about my next tasks for
the day or some knotty problem at work or home.
But one day shortly after settling in there, I was paying attention to the radio, because they were playing Queen’s Bohemian Rhapsody. I grew up on music like that; hearing it
from my car radio while driving across the German countryside was an unexpected
treat. But then the announcer spoiled it
for me when he made the station identification at the end of the song. He said:
Radio SWR-1 Rheinland Pfalz; alles ‘Oldies,’
alle zeit. (All ‘oldies,’ all the time.)
Oldies?
I was listening to an Oldies
station? And thinking of it as a breath
of fresh air? Oh, no…
I
came of age in the 1970’s. When I was in
high school, I remember that those just older than me, the twenty and
thirty-somethings, tended to listen to Oldies stations which played hits from
the 1960’s. And I remember
thinking: stuck in time; they don’t want to admit they’re getting older. Of course, my parents were stuck in an even earlier era; they still liked the ‘Big
Band’ music to which they’d danced during the Second World War. And now here I was, years later, and I
suddenly came to the realisation that I was
enamoured of ‘Oldies’ music which, for me, meant music from the 1970’s. And that made me feel…old.
I
was reminded of this yesterday morning while driving home from the gym. We had the radio on in the car, and Clara and
I were able to sing along with virtually every song played on the station to
which we were tuned. I didn’t have to
hear the announcer say ‘All Oldies, all the time’ to understand that these were
the songs which formed the soundtrack to our coming of age, to our teenage,
high school years, and they were indelibly stamped on our brains. Had our children been in the car, they
doubtless would have been rolling their eyes and trying very hard to ignore our
singing…
Today
we have read our weekly segment of Torah from the final portion in the Book of
Genesis. Next week we shall begin
reading from Exodus, but more abolut that then.
In this week’s Torah reading, Jacob is getting on in years and is
getting ready to ‘check out.’ He has had
a turbulent life, a life of ups and downs, but he has found a degree of
contentment in his old age. He is eager
to give his blessing to his sons and to the grandsons that Joseph gave him in
Egypt. The two grandsons are the ‘Ephraim’
and ‘Menashe’ to whom we refer when we give the blessing to our male children
on Friday nights.
Jacob
has found contentment in his old age, but he has apparently not learned much
from his experiences. When his sons were
young, he all but ignored the older ones to heap favour upon Joseph, because he
happened to be the son of his beloved Rachel.
He still favours the Joseph, who after all saved the entire family by
showing up at a critical moment inviting the family to live in Egypt. So much so, that he tells Joseph in this
morning’s reading, that he will consider the two boys, Epharaim and Menashe, as
if they were his own sons. And then, in
conferring his blessing upon the boys, he mixes up the two: placing his right hand, which should have
gone to the older, on the younger and pronouncing the names out of order.
Or does Jacob
really get mixed up? When Joseph tried to correct his father,
pointing out that Menashe is the older of the two, Jacob says, “I know, I know.” So he apparently intended from the start to
go against birth order in blessing them.
Because we know almost nothing at this point about the personalities of
the two boys, we can’t know what Jacob may have known about which seems to be
the more capable of the two. But in
going against birth order, Jacob is carrying on a tradition that began with his
grandfather, Abraham and which is a theme running through the entire book of
Genesis. There is a convention, and
sometimes one acts in contrast to the convention because it makes more
sense. In this case, the firstborn is
due certain perks, along with which go certain responsibilities. But sometimes, a child other than the
firstborn is the one who is going to be one who leads the family on to great
things.
There isn’t
a direct lesson in this, for most of us.
After all, most of us are unconcerned about family legacies. We only want our children to find their niche
in life, and to pursue that which will make them successful and happy. We don’t necessarily want our firstborn to
take over the family business, or follow the profession we have practiced. I have no particular desire for either of my
children to become a rabbi, but if one felt called to become one I certainly
wouldn’t object. Likewise I wouldn’t
pressure either of them to serve in the military although it appears that both
of them are headed in that direction of their own accord.
My children, Eyal and Ma'ayan, when they were very young! |
So the
concerns of the biblical patriarchs with regard to which of their sons would
carry on their legacy, has no direct parallel for me. And, I’m guessing, for you, too. But there nevertheless are important lessons to be learned from the pattern of choosing
the ‘wrong’ son. And that is, that birth
order is not really an important measure of what a child is destined to
achieve. We need to cherish each child
for the individual he or she is; we need to encourage all our children to chase
their own dreams.
I
was thinking about this Thursday night, when my son Eyal went out with a friend
for the evening and announced, on his way out the door, that he probably would
not come home until Friday. Not that I
would have wanted to stop him, but that announcement reminded me that Eyal now
18 years old. An adult. Responsible for himself. Able to stay out all night without my
permission. And responsible for the man
that he is becoming. It is, perhaps a
little scary for Clara and me. And exhilarating
for Eyal. Along with our penchant for
listening to Oldies, it’s just another reminder of the passage of time. And I hope I can say that we have taken to
heart the lesson of Jacob’s life, even if it eluded Jacob himself. Each of our children is unique. And precious.
And it is up to us to wring our hands over them, or to celebrate their
good qualities.
When
I lived in Israel, I noticed that as the end of the civil calendar year approached,
people would greet one another with ‘Happy Sylvester!’ I wondered what that meant. Then I noticed advertisements for ‘Sylvester
Parties’ on the evening of 31 December. So it became clear that ‘Sylvester’ is what
Israelis call New Year’s Eve. Why do
they call it Sylvester? I did a little
digging and found that, on the calendar of the Roman Catholic Church, 31
December is St. Sylvester’s Day. Who was
this St. Sylvester? He was Pope
Sylvester the First, who served as the head of the Catholic Church from 31
January 314 until his death on 31 December 335.
When he was canonised by the Church, his yahrzeit day went onto the calendar as the day to celebrate him.
So
what does a fourth-century Pope have to do with a night out for young
Israelis? Absolutely nothing! Well, except that they can’t call the
occasion ‘New Year’s’ since that name – in Hebrew, Rosh Hashanah – is already
taken. And even if Israel is the Jewish
State, it is also The Holy Land to two other historic faiths. In certain parts of the land, but especially
in Jerusalem, the Christian church is very visible; its feasts and occasions
are noticed by Jewish Israelis even though the latter take no part in them.
Of
course, young Israelis couldn’t care less about a fourth-century Pope. But they do
care about the passage of time, about marking it with special times and
gathering with friends. And we care,
too. I therefore wish all of you today,
a Happy Sylvester. Even though we
celebrated the Jewish New Year some weeks back, we can still take a little time
out on Monday night, noting the passing of the civil year of 2012 and the
arrival of 2013. As with the sacred
occasions from the Jewish tradition, may it be for us a marker of the passage
of time. May it be a reminder to not
fritter our time away. And may the year
2013 be for us, a year of happiness and blessing. A year of success and peace. A year in which all the desires of our hearts
are granted…for the good. Amen…Shabbat
shalom.
Thursday, December 20, 2012
Drashot for Shbbat Vayiggash
Adam Lanza, who killed 27 people last week |
Australia
has it Right
A drash for
Friday, 21 December
Now that I’ve
been here in Australia for just over half a year, there are many things about
this wonderful land that I understand and appreciate. There are still, however, things that mystify
me completely. I’ll give you an
example. In America, as here, many cars
have electric windows. Typically, the
driver’s window has a feature called ‘One Touch.’ It means that, when lowering the window, one
need only touch the switch briefly, and it will automatically lower all the way
down. It’s a safety feature to prevent
the driver from being distracted over the period of several seconds that it
takes to completely lower the window.
But in America, ‘One Touch’ only works when lowering the
window. To have ‘One Touch’ available
for raising the window would, in contrast be a safety hazard. An electric window raising all the way
automatically might accidentally close on somebody’s fingers. So when raising the driver’s window on my
American cars, I had to hold the switch all the way up. It made sense.
In the Australian-specification
car I drive here, the ‘One Touch’ feature affects raising the window,
but not lowering it. Can someone
explain that to me? It makes no sense to
this American – no sense whatsoever!
That said, there are facets of
Australian society that make good sense.
Facets that make me wish that we had such good sense in America. One is the way that you cope with the
societal problem of mental illness.
In Australia, there is less
stigma attached to those who suffer from mental illness than in America. Because of this greater acceptance, those who
suffer from such disorders are far more likely to seek help. And the help that they need, in its entire
spectrum of forms up to, and including residential care, is readily
available: both in the public system and
the private.
Over the months that I’ve been
here, I’ve observed that we have a number of members in this congregation who
have mental illnesses. And while they
don’t advertise them freely, there also is not the same element of shame and
unwillingness to talk about it, that I observed in America. So here you have car windows that drive me
crazy – no pun intended! – but a mental health treatment system that makes me
envious. Not a bad trade-off, actually!
A week ago today, a 20-year-old
man named Adam Lanza went on a shooting rampage in a small town of
Connecticut. First he killed his mother
with one of her own guns. Then he drove
to a nearby primary school, where he killed six adult faculty and staff, and 20
young children. America – and the world –
are trying to understand why a young man suffering, by all accounts with some
deep mental illness, had access to guns.
To me as an American, my question is somewhat different. Why did a young man suffering, by all accounts
with some deep mental illness, not have access to the treatment he needed?
Not all the facts about Adam Lanza
or his mother, Nancy are known. But it is
known, and widely so, that Adam had manifested symptoms of serious mental
illness since years before his recent rampage and demise. There is also some talk, perhaps ultimately to
be confirmed, that Nancy was trying to obtain a court order to get Adam
committed against his will to residential treatment for his illness. If so, she was on a fool’s errand, because in
Connecticut of all states in the USA, this is next-to-impossible to achieve.
The American aversion to
providing residential treatment, and giving helpers the means to get the severely
ill the treatment they need, stems in large part from a terrible situation that
existed in the past. Decades ago, there
was widespread institutionalisation of the mentally ill in most US states. Most states have, since then shuttered their
facilities. They also turned off mechanisms
by which those who might be a danger to themselves and others, could be
committed against their will. This
process, this societal sea-change, did not just happen in a vacuum. After the 1960’s it became widely recognised
that many state-run mental institutions were merely warehousing the ill rather
than working positively to treat them.
In some institutions there was even abuse of patients. Obviously these conditions cried out for
reforms. But in my country, the solution
was by-and-large not reform. It
was turning the mentally ill loose on the streets without the kinds of help
they needed.
So now, instead of warehousing
the mentally ill in hospitals, in America we warehouse them in homeless shelters
and in encampments in city parks and under highway bridges. It is considered impolite to say that many –
perhaps a preponderance – of the long-term homeless suffer from mental
illness. It is easier – and makes better
press – to attribute homelessness to dire economic times in one of the world’s
richest countries. But the truth is that
most homelessness in America has nothing to do with economics. Having been involved in social services for
the mentally ill before I came here, I can state this with some authority.
This is the real shortcoming of
my country in this affair. Why do we
stigmatise the mentally ill so much? Why
do we make few resources available? And
why do we make it nearly impossible to protect those who pose a danger to
themselves and others by taking custodianship of their treatment?
In America, there is a very
powerful tradition of an armed and autonomous citizenry. It is a difficult thing to explain here in
Australia where you have largely accepted that a citizen is not entitled to
possess a firearm. America is a much
more violent country – that cannot be denied.
But the existence of an armed criminal element – especially an armed
criminal gang element – here in Australia attests to the reality that outlawing
firearms only eliminates legal firearms…not the illegal ones.
My crazy, violent home country is
often difficult for those outside to understand. Of this there is no question. But in America right now, as here, the debate
engendered by last week’s terrible event is probably not the most helpful
one. The Obama Administration will try
to outlaw at least certain classes of guns for private ownership. They will probably try to make it more
difficult, through red tape, to purchase any firearms. They will try to achieve this in the
legislature. But if they find a
sufficient number of lawmakers unwilling to do their bidding, as will likely be
the case, they will surely turn to other means.
And if they do, perhaps it will be for the better of America. Or perhaps it will not, because the debate
that I think should be happening will have been largely ignored. But that’s public policy for you, and not
just in America. The really
difficult questions often – usually – get sidestepped. And that’s not good for America. And not good for other countries either. Such as Australia. But there are things that you get
right here. And for that, I’m proud to
be here with you. Shabbat shalom.
A Drash for
Saturday, 22 December
This week’s
Torah reading, the reading we have just read, is from Parashat Vayiggash. It is the climax of the saga of Joseph and
his brothers. In it, Joseph confronts
his brothers who sold him into slavery so many years back. After a time of toying with his brothers
wanting to inflict a little suffering on them, he relents. In this week’s reading, he identifies himself
to his brothers. Then he forgives
them. Lest they think themselves
unworthy of this pardon, he tells them explicitly. “Don’t flog yourselves over
having sold me. It was G-d Himself who
sent me here, to keep the entire family alive.”
So Joseph not only forgives his
brothers, he asks them not to think of themselves as guilty. I don’t know about you, but I think that’s pretty big of him. I’ve forgiven people for offences against me,
but never with such aplomb! Believe me: I wanted them to at least feel guilty!
Nobody in this room has suffered
to anything like the degree of suffering experienced by Joseph. I say this, not to minimise the pain that anybody
hearing me, may have felt at any time in life.
No, my point is only that, if Joseph can forgive the offences against
him, then we can certainly forgive any wrongs done to us by anybody close to
us. The message of the redemption of
Joseph’s brothers, is that we can offer similar redemption. Or receive it. Because if Joseph’s brothers’ transgression
is forgivable, anything done to you, or which you have done to someone else, is
also forgivable.
So Joseph missed out on the
thrill of revenge, and instead tasted the sweetness of reconciliation. It serves as a model of how to repair all the
strained relationships we may be carrying around as excess baggage, weighing us
down as we try to live our lives.
Reconciliation brings redemption.
Joseph could have chosen to hold a grudge against his brothers. Most likely, that grudge would have consumed
him for the rest of his life. But Joseph
chose reconciliation. And he thus chose
redemption – and happiness. Joseph,
freed from hatred for his brothers, went on to find happiness in his life. In that, his greatest gift was not to his
brothers – it was to himself.
As I did last week, let me close again by challenging everyone
listening, or reading this, to take the heart the lesson of Joseph. It isn’t an easy lesson. It isn’t easy to forgive those whom you
believe had wronged you. But it is far
easier than carrying a grudge for the rest of your life. And it results in a far happier rest of your life. The example of how Joseph achieved this, is
his gift to us.
Our annual recounting of the saga of Joseph and his brothers comes to
an end with this week’s reading. But
this important narrative – perhaps the most important narrative in the Torah –
can and should stick with us all year long.
When we feel consumed by the resentment, even the hatred that we feel
towards those who have wronged us, let’s remember Joseph and how he redeemed
his relationship with his brothers. Let’s
remember Joseph and how he redeemed the rest of his own life. Let’s remember Joseph and let his example influence
the way we approach our own conflicts.
Shabbat shalom!
Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Drasha for Parashat Mikeitz...Enjoy!
Joseph Interprets Pharaoh's Dreams |
The First 'Yiddischer Kopf'
Stereotypes can be negative and hurtful, or they can be positive and complimentary. Illogically, a good person objects to the former but not to the latter. I say ‘illogically’ because if there is likely to be truth in positive stereotypes, then it follows that the negative ones are just as likely to ring true. But good behaviour among people seldom follows logic! So being good people we do tend to shun negative stereotypes – in ourselves and others – while celebrating and propagating the positive ones.
One positive stereotype about us Jews, and one about which we’re very unlikely to object, is that we’re well-endowed in the brains department. Those who wish to ascribe above-average intelligence to Jews as a class, usually point to the incredible number of Nobel Prize winners who are Jews, given our tiny numbers. Or the number of successful Jewish businessmen and entrepreneurs. Or the number of leading figures in just about any and every important enterprise on the planet, except perhaps elected public office outside of a handful of countries. We celebrate – at least amongst ourselves – this statistical Jewish tendency toward superior intellect and achievement. We even have a name for it – a Yiddischer Kopf – ‘A Jewish Head.’ Some might ascribe this phenomenon to superior genetics, but I don’t. Rather, I believe Jewish success comes from a complex cocktail of causes, including a traditional reverence for learning and a tendency to think ‘outside the box.’ The latter has been a product of necessity as Jews were systematically excluded from many occupations and professions. That’s why, for example, Jews were so prominent in Hollywood in its early days; denied other outlets for our creativity, we ‘invented’ an entirely new industry based on an emerging technology.
Joseph, the son of Jacob is perhaps the first person on record to manifest a Yiddischer Kopf. Reading this week’s Torah portion, about Joseph’s successful interpretation of Pharaoh’s dreams and his elevation to Viceroy of Egypt, there are a number of lessons one can draw. Was Joseph truly endowed with a God-given ability to see the meanings of others’ dreams? Or was he simply clever enough to listen to what others told him, and use that information to maximum advantage – including his own?
The latter is the first lesson I like to draw from this delightful section of the Torah. Joseph’s flaw placed him into slavery in Egypt. The flaw to which I refer, of course, was his taking the favour his father showed him over his brothers and thinking it meant he was superior to them. No, I’m not blaming the victim here – what his brothers did to him was undeniable evil. But when you look at woes that befall us, they seldom come without some cause attributable to the ‘victim.’ This is definitely true in the case of Joseph; his tendency to lord it over to his brothers certainly angered them to the point of their assaulting and selling him. Had his brother Reuben not intervened, the others may well have murdered him in cold blood.
Consigned to servitude in Egypt, Joseph certainly could see that his ticket to a better life would be his usefulness to his master. So he applied his talents to the running of Potiphar’s household, and that elevated him to a lofty position for a slave. Any student of the history of the ‘peculiar institution’ that is slavery, knows that slaves are unlikely to have the confidence to show initiative; they are too busy trying to read the moods of their master. Potiphar’s wife’s denouncing of Joseph, another evil committed against him, must be seen as his miscalculation of the effects of her attraction for him. Again, not to blame him – but truly this is not just something that happened to him.
Now, having been rotting away in the Pharaoh’s dungeon for years, he is cleaned up and brought before the King of Egypt. Joseph, wizened through adversity, keeps his wits about him while Pharaoh recounts his dreams. Then he gives a logical explanation. This, after going out of his way to ascribe the explanation to God Himself. Surely he knows that a self-adoring Pharaoh will not respond positively to self-congratulation by an ‘inferior.’ Finally, although the Pharaoh didn’t ask, Joseph offers advice on how to apply the information he’s just provided. Given the combination of the logical sense of what Joseph is saying, and the appropriate way he presents it given the circumstances, it is predictable that the Pharaoh will not only accept the advice but think immediately of Joseph as the one man to carry it out.
See the logic in my case? Joseph may well have possessed a God-given ability to see the hidden messages in another’s dreams. On the other hand, his ability to stand before the Pharaoh and, in short order, explain the dreams and elevate himself to the one to deal with their consequences, may be attributable to something far simpler. Perhaps the Joseph narrative comes to teach us about the importance of learning to read our surroundings. Of keeping ourselves on an even keel despite our suffering. Of keeping our wits about us when put in a position of great opportunity. And of looking outside the box in creating for ourselves further opportunities. Joseph clearly possessed all these talents and more; none of them is necessarily supernatural, but put together they enabled him to rise above his misery – not once, but twice. Put together, Joseph possessed a Yiddischer Kopf, something many Jews over history have displayed.
The Joseph I see emerging from this narrative is a talented man, but the talents he develops are within the realm of what’s possible for most of us. The lesson is therefore simple; we should all seek wisdom from our experiences, pleasant or otherwise. Then we should apply that wisdom cleverly, as circumstances avail us. Joseph was talented and successful, but also entirely ordinary. From his example, we can learn how to develop a Yiddischer Kopf. And we can thus achieve great things!
(Note: This drasha can also be found on the UPJ website: http://www.upj.org.au/index.php/learning/parshat-hashavua)
Thursday, December 6, 2012
Drashot for Veyeishev...Enjoy!
From the American Rose Theatre production of Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat |
A Cause for
Grievance…an Opportunity for Reconciliation
A Drash for
Friday, 7 December 2012
Was there
something that your mother or father said or did habitually when you were a
child, which bugged you at the time? If
your answer is truly no, that makes you quite exceptional! Because most of us, no matter how many years
have transpired, keenly remember something their parents did that frustrated
them. Here’s an example:
Child: “Why does it have to be that way?”
Mother: “Because I’m the Mum,
and I say so.”
Tell me you never heard that
from your Mum! If you’re like most of us
in this room tonight, you heard it many times.
And it bugged you. And if you’re
like most of the rest of us, you’ve also in turn said it to your children…and
they didn’t like it either!
Look, far be it for me to stand
up here and try to stir up old flash-points between parents and children! I’ve spoken enough about the difficulty of
such relationships that you know that’s not what I’m about. But if we’re honest – and we aught to be so –
we have a way to repeating behaviours that we found objectionable when on the
receiving end.
Take our Torah portion this
week.
Jacob was the ‘victim’ of his
father, Isaac’s, preference for his twin brother Esau. He felt aggrieved over the preference, and so
did his mother, Rivka. So much so, that
the two of them plotted successfully to get blind old Isaac to give Esau’s
blessing to Jacob. This sent Jacob
scurrying into exile, in fear of his life, from Esau.
Now, with 12 sons of his own,
Jacob is doing the same thing. He is
showing preference for one son, Joseph over the others. And the other 11 sons, predictably don’t like
it one bit. We do not know for sure that
Esau chased his brother out of Canaan in a murderous rage; we only know from
the text that Jacob feared it. But our narrative does tell us what Joseph’s brothers do about their grievance. They toss him into a pit, and then sell him
to a passing band of Ishmaelite slave traders.
It could have been worse. All
except Reuben were ready to actually murder Joseph and tell their father that
he’d been torn by wild beasts.
I don’t know about you, but I
find being a parent quite challenging at times.
It’s surely the hardest job in the world. As I said recently, children don’t come with
an instruction manual. There are no
university or TAFE courses to complete, that will make one a competent
parent. Much of parenting is like flying
by the seat of one’s pants. Sometimes
you get where you want to go. Sometimes,
you get completely lost in the fog.
The good news is this. Iff we’re truly trying to do our best,
and if we remember that our children are our most precious possessions, and if
we treat them with that in mind…then chances are, everything will work out in
the end. The times when we were
frustrated to give an explanation to a child’s demand, and we said ‘because I’m
the parent’ will be the subject for laughter someday. We’re human and therefore liable to favour
one child over another. But if we’re
intentional about how we approach our children, we might be able to transcend
that preference or at least minimise the extent to which we let it guide our
actions.
And the other good news is that
children are resilient, and often forgiving.
Someday, when our children are grown, they’ll laugh about how arbitrary
we were at times when laying down the law.
And they’ll make us laugh, too.
Siblings, many years later often laugh at how a parent favoured one over
the other. So all the little foibles we
manifest in raising our children are, thankfully, not fatal. Chances are, our children will forgive
us. And we’ll be able to forgive them,
in turn, for the way they’ve tested us along the way.
Want proof? Look at Joseph and his brothers. Their actions in this week’s reading, lead to
a chain of unfortunate events. How
Joseph suffered! Sold into slavery. Then denounced by his owner’s wife. Thrown into the dungeon to rot for the rest
of his miserable life. Whatever
grievances we might have against our parents or our siblings, how could we
possibly match that? The most aggrieved of
our lot cannot even come close.
And yet…when Joseph eventually
finds himself face-to-face with his brothers, a lifetime later, his anger
relents and his reconciles with them.
Because the love of brother for brother is a powerful bond. It can weather and transcend many awful
offences and grievances. This week’s
Torah reading only sets the stage. It
will be several weeks before we see this actually play out. But don’t mind the preview. After all, when you see a trailer, it doesn’t
ruin the movie for you!
I know that conflicts –
sometimes seeming to be intractable – exist between some of you, and your
parents or siblings, or your children, or all of the above. And my advice is simple…lay it to rest! Just as Joseph and his brother were able to
lay aside their conflict, so to can we lay aside our infinitely less
intractable ones. That, I believe is the
Torah’s message through the Joseph story.
The potential for good from repaired relationships, is far more
significant than the gain from allowing family conflicts to fester.
May the rest we allow ourselves
on this Shabbat, give us the strength to heal our conflicts and restore our
most important relationships. Shabbat
shalom.
A Drash for
Saturday, 8 December 2012
The
narrative in this morning’s Torah reading is probably one of the most appalling
in the entire Five Books of Moses. In
it, Joseph’s 11 brothers react to the favour shown to Joseph by their
father. In it, Joseph’s 11 brothers
react to Joseph’s sense of entitlement over them. In it, Joseph’s 11 brothers react to Joseph’s
sense of superiority to his brothers.
They react by setting upon him in the wilderness where nobody else can
see what is happening. They strip Joseph
of the many-coloured tunic that is the symbol of Jacob’s favour. They cast him into a pit. While Joseph lies in the pit and the brothers
are eating, a caravan of Ishmaelite slave traders comes by. The brothers sell Joseph to the traders. Then they go home and tell their father that
Joseph has been killed by wild beasts.
Jacob, their father is inconsolable.
It’s an appalling story
indeed. And it opens what is, for me the
most delightful section of the Torah.
As I’ve said before, I find the
Torah to be an incredible repository of wisdom for us, in our age. No other text that purports to be a morality
play, can match the raw drama that the Torah presents to us. No other text that purports to provide
insights into the real life of human beings, can match the depth of the
insights that this text provides.
I identify with Joseph, more
than with any other personality in the Torah.
Joseph suffered terribly because of his father’s mistakes and his
inability to rise above them. He
suffered unspeakable misery. And yet he
was somehow blessed with a resilience far beyond any that most of us will have
to employ in our lives. This incredible
resilience enabled him to arise from his dungeon, listen sympathetically to the
Pharaoh, and process the Pharaoh’s dreams against his keen insight. Then he went on to manage the affairs of
Egypt during difficult times. Finally,
face to face with his brothers who had treated him so cruelly, he found it
within himself to reconcile with them.
Joseph had some incredible skills, and deep flaws. But in the end, what shines through is his
humanity.
This appeals to me, because deep
in the gut I believe that our task on earth is to be, as they say, a mensch. To be human.
To look and reach outward, and do good for others. This is what makes life, with all its
unpleasantness, worthwhile. This is what
brings us happiness and ultimate meaning.
Joseph modelled this to us for all time, if we would but take the time
to read and process his story.
Do you think of this book we
call the Torah as a quaint holdover? Do
you read it and wonder what’s the point?
Does its occasional opaqueness frustrate you? If so, I recommend to you the section that
opens with this week’s reading and continues to the end of the book of
Genesis. Read it slowly and
thoughtfully. Try to put yourself into
the shoes of any of the principle characters.
Joseph. Jacob. The brothers.
Anyone else. But do think about
Joseph in particular. Think about the
prissy, favoured child whom we see in this week’s reading. And see the kind of man that he becomes.
If you’re going through life
trying to do good things for others, it’s easy to feel aggrieved and
cheated. It’s easy to get into a snit
about some slight, real or imagined. It’s
easy to feel the ‘superiority’ of the martyr.
Joseph could have gone down that road, but he didn’t. Instead, he reached deep within himself for
the wellspring of talent to meet the unique challenges life had dealt him.
I identify with Joseph, not
because I feel I aught to be the prime minister of Egypt. Rather, I identify with him because I’ve
faced, and continue to face, my own unique set of challenges. It’s easy to get discouraged at times. But if we reflect on Joseph’s life, we can
take heart and face our own challenges.
We can rise above the lot handed us by our brothers. Or whomever.
And when later faced with our tormentors, we can meet them in
forgiveness. We can counter hatred with
magnanimity. We can continue a cycle of
tit-for-tat. Or we can, like Joseph, see
the good that has come out of the situation.
And we can rejoice.
In Mishnah Avot we’re told: Who is
rich? He that rejoices in his lot. Joseph, perhaps more than any other
personality in the Torah, epitomises this spirit. Again and again he lifts himself out of the
pit and goes on to achieve. And he forgives
those who have wronged him.
Like Joseph, we can decide to
transcend any grievance we feel towards others.
We can take the lemons life has handed us, and make lemonade. We can put the past behind us, and go on to
ever greater things.
May this be the lesson that we
learn from the readings from Today to the end of the Book of Genesis. May this be the lesson that serves as our
prime operating principle for the rest of our lives. Shabbat shalom.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)